Anecdotal evidence isn't worth a lot, but back in 1995-96, I worked with a young guy named Pat who walked around with his cellphone glued to his right ear. It was a habit that stood out, because so few people had cellphones then. He was constantly on it all through his workday. In early1996, Pat constantly complained to me about chronic pain above his right shoulder blade. I kept telling him to go to a chiropractor, get it x-rayed. Nope, he was too busy with his new promotion, his new wife, and their new baby. God, he was only 26 or 27. In the summer of 1996, he finally went to a doctor. An x-ray showed a tumor the size of a softball behind his shoulder. He died three months later. His baby was only six months old. He and his wife were still madly in love.
Made a big impression on me, that did. It wasn't hard at all to connect two dots and find a causal connection. I've never trusted cellphones since then. I only have a Jitterbug, which isn't a smartphone but has texting and voicemail. I only carry it with me when I'm actually going somewhere and use a landline for 95% of my phone time.
By the way, I recently bought a cheap meter to measure electric and magnetic fields in the house. Wow, what an eye-opener! One adjustment we made: we now unplug the modem-router when we're sleeping, because it's located so close to the bedrooms.
I am confused about the risk difference between static E and M fields, and the transmissions via those fields. Are the latter more dangerous to health than the former?
Thanks for covering this topic, Chris. Your range of knowledge is truly amazing.
I don't know that there is any solid evidence on E versus M, but given that there is very little magnetic (ferrous) metal content in the body, but there is all kinds of electrical activity going on, I would prioritize avoiding E first.
It's been years since I checked, but there were huge differences in the fields from different cell phone models and brands in the past. But again more important in the "glued to the ear" scenario you mentioned.
Then there was the iPhone model more recently than that where a person's grip affected the reception big time. Not a good sign.
Thanks to beam steering technology 5G has lower power density and is the safest cellular emission yet. And it's amazing how many people don't understand inverse square.
But still, the 5G activated the chemtrails and created Covid. Do I have that right?
Oh man....the f-ing chemtrails. I've seen multiple tweets lately on that.
Possible topic for a future post but I'm not sure I even want to venture down that rabbit hole. The flat earthers are some true believers, and I expect the chemtrailers are right there with them. They probably can't be persuaded at all even seeing instant natural fog/cloud formation off the edge of a mountain just due to air currents.
They point to photos of large aircraft filled with a hundred or more tanks inside as evidence of chemical delivery systems. Those are load test rigs for commercial aircraft, pumping water around to simulate passenger distributions. Real tankers have much larger, and fewer tanks 🤡.
Grinding some toxin into a fine mist and flying as far above your target as possible to release your evil chems into the winds aloft so they land weeks later on another continent really does seem to be the best way to go about it 😁
Anecdotal evidence isn't worth a lot, but back in 1995-96, I worked with a young guy named Pat who walked around with his cellphone glued to his right ear. It was a habit that stood out, because so few people had cellphones then. He was constantly on it all through his workday. In early1996, Pat constantly complained to me about chronic pain above his right shoulder blade. I kept telling him to go to a chiropractor, get it x-rayed. Nope, he was too busy with his new promotion, his new wife, and their new baby. God, he was only 26 or 27. In the summer of 1996, he finally went to a doctor. An x-ray showed a tumor the size of a softball behind his shoulder. He died three months later. His baby was only six months old. He and his wife were still madly in love.
Made a big impression on me, that did. It wasn't hard at all to connect two dots and find a causal connection. I've never trusted cellphones since then. I only have a Jitterbug, which isn't a smartphone but has texting and voicemail. I only carry it with me when I'm actually going somewhere and use a landline for 95% of my phone time.
By the way, I recently bought a cheap meter to measure electric and magnetic fields in the house. Wow, what an eye-opener! One adjustment we made: we now unplug the modem-router when we're sleeping, because it's located so close to the bedrooms.
I am confused about the risk difference between static E and M fields, and the transmissions via those fields. Are the latter more dangerous to health than the former?
Thanks for covering this topic, Chris. Your range of knowledge is truly amazing.
I don't know that there is any solid evidence on E versus M, but given that there is very little magnetic (ferrous) metal content in the body, but there is all kinds of electrical activity going on, I would prioritize avoiding E first.
It's been years since I checked, but there were huge differences in the fields from different cell phone models and brands in the past. But again more important in the "glued to the ear" scenario you mentioned.
Then there was the iPhone model more recently than that where a person's grip affected the reception big time. Not a good sign.
Thanks to beam steering technology 5G has lower power density and is the safest cellular emission yet. And it's amazing how many people don't understand inverse square.
But still, the 5G activated the chemtrails and created Covid. Do I have that right?
Oh man....the f-ing chemtrails. I've seen multiple tweets lately on that.
Possible topic for a future post but I'm not sure I even want to venture down that rabbit hole. The flat earthers are some true believers, and I expect the chemtrailers are right there with them. They probably can't be persuaded at all even seeing instant natural fog/cloud formation off the edge of a mountain just due to air currents.
They point to photos of large aircraft filled with a hundred or more tanks inside as evidence of chemical delivery systems. Those are load test rigs for commercial aircraft, pumping water around to simulate passenger distributions. Real tankers have much larger, and fewer tanks 🤡.
Grinding some toxin into a fine mist and flying as far above your target as possible to release your evil chems into the winds aloft so they land weeks later on another continent really does seem to be the best way to go about it 😁