The real fascists show themselves constantly, while pointing fingers at people who are not remotely fascist

As an example, the left is crapping themselves over the Italian election and thus spewing forth some of their most vile lies against the winners.

It was only a few days ago I wrote about who the real fascists are. Of course they are on the left!!

Here’s New Zealand’s prime minister, in a super familiar left wing pattern, calling for suppression of free speech.

Ardern then asked the audience how they could tackle various challenges if people are allowed to share opposing narratives online.

"After all, how do you successfully end a war if people are led to believe the reason for its existence is not only legal but noble? How do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists? How do you ensure the human rights of others are upheld, when they are subjected to hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology?" she asked.

Ardern then suggested that online speech is a weapon often used by those with evil intent. 

"The weapons may be different but the goals of those who perpetuate them is often the same. To cause chaos and reduce the ability of others to defend themselves. To disband communities. To collapse the collective strength of countries who work together," she claimed.

The prime minister urged action from the gathered audience of U.N. leaders.

"But we have an opportunity here to ensure that these particular weapons of war do not become an established part of warfare. In these times, I am acutely aware of how easy it is to feel disheartened. We are facing many battles on many fronts," she said. "But there is cause for optimism. Because for every new weapon we face, there is a new tool to overcome it. For every attempt to push the world into chaos, is a collective conviction to bring us back to order. We have the means; we just need the collective will." 

This vile hag is indeed a full on fascist. If you have any reasonable brain function at all, you immediately see the key parts she does not mention. SHE gets to decide what speech is correct, and of course what speech is incorrect due to being “misinformation”/”disinformation”/”hateful”/etc., and then SHE gets to decide what speech is allowed and what speech is disallowed. So no one can oppose her narrative!

THIS IS FULL ON AUTHORITARIANISM, as in Marxism, fascism, tyranny, etc. The specific term used doesn’t really matter. Recognizing it clearly does matter, as does recognizing that it is ALL from the left! It is NOT from the right! Fascists are NOT on the right!!

Communists, AKA Marxists, differ from fascists only in trivial ways. Most readers here will already know that the word “Nazi” in “Nazi Party” in Germany before and during WWII was a shortened version of “National Socialist Party”. And of course socialists everywhere are some version of communists. It’s just a matter of what degree of communist they are. From Commie lite all the way to a full on communist who simply pretends to be a supposedly “milder” socialist.

Hitler and company of course played up the rivalry between his ideals and those of communists simply for the purposes of political power. After blaming the Reichstag fire on communists early on in 1933, of course he stuck with claims that his Nazi party was the better alternative and that communists must be crushed. None of that meant Hitler and other fascists were within light years of being on the right. They were just slightly different tyrants on the left.

The whole idea of trying to represent the political spectrum as one dimensional, as in all on one line, is completely absurd. At a minimum, you need two dimensions to define where worldwide political views lie and have been in the past. Here’s a very rough first draft I came up with a while back. I need a better software tool to be able to revise and update it.

Note that the large orange circle is for “independents”. This is because people identifying as “independent” can be all over the map, although almost never on the right for various reasons. Perhaps because the choice of “independent” in and of itself indicates a lack of conviction and/or a desire to hide one’s true intentions.

Similarly the RINOs in the brown oval will cover a wide range, and again rarely on the right. Although some will take positions on the right at certain points for political gain within the Republican party. And indeed some of them are plenty far enough left to be in lockstep with the communist/fascist center of today’s democrat party. If you doubt the two arrows showing how much further right Bill Clinton was than today’s democrats, including how much further right he was policy wise after the mid term elections of 1994 (and the Conservative wave lead by Newt Gingrich), you’re either too young, have a short memory, you only consume left wing “information”, or you’re pretty much brain dead.

It has been suggested to me to use the Y axis for socially liberal versus socially Conservative ideas. The problem with that is that the same Y axis could not apply on the left. Once you get far enough left, totalitarians really differ very little in their control. While libertarians are mostly way to the right and are fine with murdering unborn babies and allowing the open selling and using of nearly all drugs, to name two important examples, there is no equivalent among tyrants.

If babies are to be killed before or even long after birth under fascist or Marxist rule, the state will decide who gets killed. It will not be up to the pregnant woman to freely engage in murder for hire. Drug use will also be fully controlled by the state.

So the net result is that while the primary/X axis going left and right is absolutely and easily tied to the size and power of the government, there would need to be two different Y axes if you were to choose to use “socially” Conservative versus liberal on the right side of the spectrum. As is I think that simply showing libertarians as extending to the right over almost to anarchists with their obviously unworkable ideas on how far individuals should be able to go and how lax government should be, as in to the point of trampling on the rights of other human beings, is probably sufficient.

As alluded to above in the secondary title, Italy has a new prime minister that is ostensibly much more Conservative that her recent predecessors. This does not make her fascist in the slightest. Priorities of hers are individual identity, family, and religion. None of these align with fascism at all. Not one iota.

They don’t align with communists or other flavors of tyrants either. Tyrants hate all of these things and look to crush individualism and religion in order to have more obedient subjects. The comments of so many left wingers everywhere for the past 3 plus years (and more) against freedom of speech, and against the right to keep and bear arms going back for many decades just reinforces that 1,000 times over.

PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING THOSE ON THE RIGHT BELIEVE IN IS DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED TO FASCISM AND COMMUNISM!!! Do not doubt that and do not forget that. Ponder it every time some left winger calls anyone on the right a fascist.