The Paycheck Analogy - to voting by mail
If you aren't willing to sign up right now for this to happen with your paycheck, SS check, stock dividend, welfare check, etc., then don't claim mail voting is safe and secure.
Democrats now and in 2020 claimed all up and down about how safe mail in voting was. They were the ones who enacted mass mail/drop box voting in 2020 in many states as part of the scamdemic/plandemic. And they were the ones cheating this way in 2020 in big numbers as shown in ‘2000 Mules’. So of course they’re going to claim mail in voting is safe.
The Branco cartoon above is from late 2020, so you can add “2022” text on the huge box below the “2020”.
Democrats are not the only ones who have supported mail voting. There have been plenty of idiot republicans who have done so too. Whether it’s cowardice on confronting left wing lies of “voter suppression” in discussions over election security or pure stupidity, many republicans have gone along with it. I don’t go along with it because it’s blatantly obvious that mail voting is COMPLETELY INSECURE. I covered this more thoroughly in a prior post, so I’m not going over that again here.
Instead I’ve got an analogy for you to challenge left wingers everywhere with. Throw idiot republicans in there too. Are they okay with paychecks, and all other income payments they receive, being handled completely by mail including the deposit, and multiple third parties handle their checks along the way???
There’s no real world direct correlation for every step of the vote by mail process to receiving paychecks, but it’s still useful to show what would be analogous. I’ve included some true events from the contesting of the 2020 election, and the process would go like this:
Your paycheck has to be mailed to you. No direct deposit and not handed to you at work. If you don’t receive a check, whether it was stolen, delivered to the wrong address, or whatever, you have to go down to a “Check Mailing Center” in your area and try to get a new one.
When you go to the “Check Mailing Center” to get a new check, the “Check Mailing Workers” may tell you that your check has already been deposited. If that happens you’ll have to ask for a “provisional check” that may never get deposited. Never getting deposited for you will almost certainly be true if a thief was able to get your check and get it deposited already.
When your paycheck is mailed, it is in a large and very distinct envelope, such that all the postal workers including your specific mailman, and anyone else who sees it, knows exactly what it is.
If you do receive your paycheck, you must sign it, put your bank routing and account number on it, and then send it back in another large distinct envelope such that everyone knows it’s a paycheck.
You can’t send it directly to your bank. Instead it goes to a “Check Depositing Center” where it will be touched by multiple “Deposit Workers”.
You’re assured that these “Deposit Workers” are good people and that there are other people watching them to make sure your check gets deposited, but you have no idea who any of these people are and you’re not allowed to go to the “Check Depositing Center” to make sure your check is being deposited. Seeing public evidence such as newspaper articles or social media posts showing that the heads of the “Check Depositing Center” are closely connected to and/or express love for well known check fraud criminals or other people convicted of theft does not mean that there could be anything suspicious or illegal going on at the “Check Depositing Center”, and those connections will not be considered in any court cases that might arise later.
As part of the process at the “Check Depositing Center”, scanning machines will decide if the routing and account numbers you wrote, and even the original information and amount on your check, are legible enough or otherwise “believable” based on criteria set by “Deposit Workers” or set by some other third party. But again you don’t get to go and see the scanning process, you don’t get to see the scanning criteria, and you don’t get to know who set the criteria.
If the scanning machine determines that there is any problem with your check visually, your check will then go to a “Check Adjudicator”. The “Check Adjudicator” then gets to determine if the amount on your check needs to be changed, or if the routing or account number where it is to be deposited need to be changed. You don’t get to see any of this happen and even if a record is kept of the check image and the changes made by the “Check Adjudicators”, the heads of the “Check Depositing Center” will refuse to show you those records and in fact will go to court multiple times to try and keep any of that information from you.
After scanning and any adjudication, your check will then be deposited into either your account or some other account that the “Check Adjudicator” put on your check. Even if the check was deposited into your account, your bank will be subject to hacking and/or improper software programming such that your funds and those of others could be transferred into other accounts.
When your check finally gets done at the “Check Depositing Center”, you have no way at all to confirm that the check was actually deposited into your account. In fact no one anywhere can confirm where your check was deposited or the amount of the deposit. The only information available is anonymous deposit records for you and thousands of other people in your area.
If you and many other people then suspect that your checks were misdirected, or stolen, or the amounts were changed, or anything else was done to disenfranchise you of your deposit, you have no recourse in court either. Even if you have thousands of witnesses from various areas all over the country, including many “Deposit Workers” filling out sworn affidavits, no court anywhere will actually hear that testimony and look at any other evidence in open court.
If you and other people want to see all of the checks that went through any given “Check Depositing Center”, along with deposit records and any other records to do your own verification, the heads of the “Check Depositing Center” and in fact the entire “Check Depositing Organization” at the state and federal levels will fight you in court for weeks, months, years or however long it takes.
Throughout all of your verification efforts, the “Check Depositing Organization” officials and the media will label you and others “Deposit Deniers”.
If you’re not willing to sign up for the above right now, and subject your income to that process, then do NOT try to tell me that you really believe voting by mail is secure.
It’s important to note that there is a key difference between ballots and checks that makes all the efforts to hide information obvious evidence of fraud. Once out of an envelope or out of a voter’s hands, a ballot is anonymous. So there is zero public information at risk when someone views ballots after an election, and election results are absolutely public information. So if you have a functioning brain you know immediately that anyone trying to hide ballots after an election has engaged in some level of cheating that they are afraid will be exposed if anyone gets to view the ballots.
Left wing argument that mail voting is required: "What about the military, elderly, and disabled?" The simple answer:
1. Polling sites at foreign military bases.
2. You telling me the elderly and disabled you speak of can't even make it to a doctor once every 2 years either??? Surely if they're serious about voting like they should be, they can make it to a polling place just the same way they make it to a doctor's office.
Wow. What a great analogy 👏👏👏