Suppression of media is another tactic of tyrants

And just like Australia has been doing, Canada is now trying to keep the truth from coming out. There's an information bonus in the 2nd half of this post.

Remember when the left was all for protesting against government? Anti war protests for many years back in the 60s and 70s? Protests against any Republican president and even sometimes against democrats too? But now the vast majority on the left oppose protests against the government as long as they agree with the government position. Of course protesters they agree with are still fine, but their general support of things anti government is gone.

Since they have the support of so many on the left, and the left controls most media, tyrannical government officials are now emboldened enough even in supposed democracies to force members of the media away from the sites where they are engaging in tyranny. The trucker protests in Canada can now be added to that list. Fascists there don’t want to get caught on camera and have their actions publicized, so they are kicking out the media.

If limiting or completely suppressing news coverage sounds like something you learned about Nazi Germany, Stalinist Russia, communist Cuba, communist China, etc., that’s because it is. Just add this to the list of crimes against humanity being comitted by Fidel Castro’s bastard son.

The picture above is from this link, which not only provides solid support for the striking similarities shown in the side by side pictures above, but also demonstrates how easy it is to shred so many left wing “debunkings”.

So what is all this talk about “debunking” the claim? It could not be less compelling. 100% of the ‘debunking’ articles avoid addressing the Caribbean trip altogether. For example, in Vice’s article, “We Investigated Those Damning Rumors About Fidel Castro Being Justin Trudeau’s Real Dad” by Drew Brown, Brown does not investigate anything. His just mocks the story and then abruptly states this:

Oh, wait. Justin was born December 25, 1971, nine months after Pierre and Margaret’s honeymoon in British Columbia and long before the couple travelled to Cuba. Dang.

I guess you actually can’t believe everything that semi-professional agitators post on the internet.

Not a very impressive argument, Brown. Brown’s so-called ‘investigation’ altogether missed an obvious Wikipedia article showing the Trudeaus were in the Caribbean in Spring 1971, with citations to the actual reporters covering it. His uncited claim that Justin was born “long before the couple travelled to Cuba” is just a recitation of the official dates Trudeau visited in his official capacity as prime minister. He provides no evidence the Trudeaus had never been there before. No evidence they had not met Castro before. No evidence Castro never travelled to see them in the Caribbean. He altogether avoids the story he claims he disproved and then tries to do a mic drop. Not very impressive at all.

All of the articles ‘debunking’ story follow the same format. They all come from left-leaning websites who sympathize with Trudeau. They all recite the official 1976 travel dates of Pierre Trudeau as Prime Minister as though that proves they never travelled to or around Cuba on any prior date. They altogether avoid addressing the easily researchable Caribbean trip in Spring 1971. That is strange for authors who claim to have the truth on their sides.

Nothing has been debunked. If anything, the intellectual dishonesty of avoiding the very story makes it seem more convincing.

There’s more at the link, but the tactic of completely omitting key facts is standard operating procedure for leftists when “debunking” or when doing any sort of “reporting”.

An assessment of Trudea’s actions does not depend on believing he is Castro’s son, but if you are persuaded by the story above and the photographic evidence, it’s another case of the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.