Still think abortion supporters aren't evil??

And think the DOJ right now isn't just an enforcer for left wing policies?

If you actually know what an abortion entails, and you still support abortion being used as birth control, indeed you are evil. If you weren’t aware of what a tiny fraction red herring “rape, incest, or danger to the mother” abortions are, try doing the research to confirm that the vast majority of abortions are simply birth control after conception. Here’s one article on the subject. Even the far left wing USA Today covered this a few years ago.

If you oppose abortion and know what an abortion entails, you should realize that those who support it don’t just have different ideas than you, or political disagreements with you. You should know that they are evil and you should treat them as though they are evil. They want baby murder for hire to continue unrestricted, and in many cases they want to kill babies themselves. Here’s an example, and the picture contains a link to a 4 second long video:

Here’s another:

And one more, and again the picture has an embedded link to the video:

All of the above and more were linked from the Gateway Pundit here, and they had a related prior article here.

And one of the best examples of what those who support killing innocent babies are like, and again thanks to Drew Hernandez, here’s a sick asshole coming right out and admitting his evil. As above, clicking the picture takes you to the Twitter post so you can watch the video:

Meanwhile, the evil left wingers have been gathering outside the Supreme Court and also outside the homes of supreme court justices in blatant violation of federal law:

And these blatant violations of federal law have been going on for two months since the SCOTUS draft decision was illegally leaked. But have any of these illegal “protesters” been arrested and charged with violating the federal law that applies??? The relevant text of ‘19 U.S. Code 1507’ is below, with my bold:

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

I used bold above to show that THERE IS NO EXCEPTION. THERE IS NO TYPE OF DEMONSTRATION NEAR A JUDGE’S HOME THAT IS LEGAL. If you have even typical 3rd or 4th grade level reading comprehension, you can see that it does not matter whether the “protesters” (Which are much more like actual insurrectionists.) are standing still or are moving. “Parading” covers marching, walking, etc., even if you thought “picketing” only meant stationary protesting. If “pickets or parades” wasn’t all encompassing enough for you, the words “any other demonstration” remove any doubt whatsoever. There is zero doubt that you CANNOT be outside a judge’s home or a court doing anything to influence their decision.

Over at left wing Politifake, however, they demonstrate what a complete joke left wing “fact checkers” are. In typical fashion, Politifake finds some left wing loon to give an absurd opinion:

"Targeted, stationary protest, solely and directly in front of a justice's home, with the intention of influencing that justice’s opinion on a vote, could constitute a violation of Section 1507," said Vera Eidelman, staff attorney with the ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project, in an interview with PolitiFact.

But claiming this section prohibits all protests in a justice’s neighborhood or that it bans people from marching past a justice’s home would be too broad of an interpretation, Eidelman said.

This is quite educational with respect to left wing loon interpretation of laws in general. They either cannot grasp simple concepts at all, or they simply deny that they exist. Roe v. Wade itself and its “penumbra of an emanation” bullshit may be the best example ever, but for now just compare the text of the law above to the opinion of the left wing loon quoted by Politifake.

Do you see anything in the text of the law that requires the protest be stationary? Do you see the word “targeted” mentioned? And of course what is the implied non-targeted reason that the loon claims the left wing protesters are there for??? And do you see anything about “solely” or “directly in front of” in the text of the law??? No, of course you do not.

But in the “brain” of a liberal, “near” is somehow contorted to “solely and directly in front of”. Like so many other times, the person is either brain dead or is a damn liar. Either way, you can see the danger that left wingers pose to the rule of law across the board. When you can pretend that the plain language passed into law or in the Constitution means something entirely different than the obvious meaning, then the words and thus the law have no meaning at all. If the lunacy is allowed to stand, there is no way this country survives as is.

But since the DOJ under any recent democrat president acts at least partially as a left wing enforcement division, and as of Biden’s fraudulent installment does so more than ever, the illegal protests have not been stopped. Not even with an assassination attempt.

And of course no less than the corrupt and evil “Senate Majority Leader” publicly threatened Kavanaugh and Gorsuch over two years ago, and yet faced no consequences either. Nor has Maxine Waters been held accountable for her numerous calls for violence against those who oppose the left. Same story for all the other left wing politicians calling for lawlessness, including violence, against anyone who dares to oppose their policies.