LinkedIn was founded by a vile leftist toad, so it's no surprise he's got Trump Derangement Syndrome

Maybe I’m being too harsh, but does Reid Hoffman resemble a fat toad or what?? Another Jerry Nadler?

I started this Substack in part because LinkedIn locked me out of my account for telling the truth about Corona related issues back in December of 2021. I just could not accept the full on insanity that was literally killing hundreds of thousands of people at least, via the death jabs and continued suppression of alternative treatments, and in the process also destroying this country.

I did manage to get one email reply from LinkedIn listing three comments I had posted that supposedly violated their policies. I backed up all of those factual comments with links and commentary, but of course the far left wing LI employees did not care. Just like FascistBook, just like Twitter before the Musk buyout, and just like YouTube and other left wing platforms, you go against the narrative and you get silenced no matter how truthful your content is.

Of course many people will have the reaction of “ But LinkedIn is a professional site, why would you post something about Corona there?”. The thing is though, LinkedIn already had PLENTY of posts and comments related to Corona. Of course they did.

Given that companies were forcing the death jabs on people, forcing worse than useless masking (The latest news on that front, and the study behind it.), and the obvious severe business impact of various types of lockdowns, all things Corona is absolutely business and professional related. And as long as you were spouting the narrative, you could post about all things Corona all day and every day on LinkedIn.

After I got a notice that my comment that some expert estimates of the Corona survival rate OVERALL (as in very unhealthy and very old people included) was 99.9% was forbidden because it was false, I did a test. Someone replied to me that before the “vaccines” were rolled out that a full 15% of people who got Corona were dying from it!!! This is of course off the charts absurd and horridly false, and none of the biggest fear porn peddlers the world over were claiming anything anywhere near 10%, let alone 15%.

Even Neil Ferguson, the “expert” in the UK, who was taking trips across town to sleep with his mistress while advocating for strict lockdowns, did not claim even a 5% death rate. His early doomsday prediction factored into “15 day to slow the spread”, and he was estimating only 0.9% of infected people dying:

The following summary of the Ferguson/​Imperial College report provides clues about how the model came to generate such dramatic conclusions:

• In the (unlikely) absence of any control measures or spontaneous changes in individual behavior, we would expect a peak in mortality (daily deaths) to occur after approximately 3 months. In such scenarios, given an estimated R0 of 2.4, we predict 81% of the G.B. and U.S. populations would be infected over the course of the epidemic… In total, in an unmitigated epidemic, we would predict approximately 510,000 deaths in G.B. and 2.2 million in the U.S., not accounting for the potential negative effects of health systems being overwhelmed on mortality.

This worst‐​case simulation came up with 2.2 million deaths by simply assuming that 81% of the population gets infected ­–268 million people– and that 0.9% of them die. It did not assume health systems would have to be overwhelmed to result in so many deaths, though it did make that prediction.

Neither the high infection rate nor the high fatality rate holds up under scrutiny.

Note that the article is from April of 2020, so more than 1.5 years before the absurd 15% death rate comment that I reported to LinkedIn as misinformation.

There were plenty of other estimates as well that the death rate was less than 1% overall, including John Ionnadis’s very well researched estimate of 0.15%:

Conclusions: All systematic evaluations of seroprevalence data converge that SARS-CoV-2 infection is widely spread globally. Acknowledging residual uncertainties, the available evidence suggests average global IFR of ~0.15% and ~1.5-2.0 billion infections by February 2021 with substantial differences in IFR and in infection spread across continents, countries and locations.

The study linked above with that quoted text was published in May of 2021, and of course if you subtract the fatality rate from 100% to get a survival rate, and then round up to the nearest tenth, you get 99.9% instead of 99.85%. Of course any reasonable “fact check” claiming a “policy violation” for “misinformation” would only ask for the value to be shown as 99.85% instead of 99.9%.

If you’re radical left wing fascists though, you silence that person completely for daring to show that Corona was not nearly as deadly as claimed by the left. Don’t you dare say anything to interfere with the fear porn campaign that’s helping to rake in tens of billions in big pharma profits, and at the same time increase the power of left wing politicians.

What do you suppose LinkedIn did with the comment I test reported claiming the bizarre 15% death rate??? Well it was hunky dory!! Of course it was!!

Note how their “Trust & Safety Team” reviewed it thoroughly, and found that it was A-OK. I hope you will see what a complete joke the “fact checking” and “Trust & Safety” at LinkedIn are. Unfortunately, much more so than other left wing social media platforms, there is currently no real competition for a professional networking site. So yes this hampers job searches for anyone who dares to challenge left wing narratives, so any support is appreciated to keep this Stack going. While $5 per month is the lowest I can price the monthly subscription per Substack’s policies, the “Buy me a coffee” or “Tip jar” buttons (Which lead to the same site.) are only $1.

But what is LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman up to lately that makes this post more relevant right now? Well, he’s bankrolling the asinine suit by the very strange woman claiming that Trump raped her years ago. You know, the one that even creeped out Anderson Cooper. This is another must watch, and it’s only 37 seconds long:

E. Jean Carroll, pictured above, says “I think that most people think of rape as being sexy”. At that point Cooper wants to go to break. Then she quickly says “Think of the fantasies”.

At which point you can tell Cooper is thinking “For God’s sake let’s go to break!!!”. ROFL!!! She adds in one more creepy comment at the end before they do cut to break, but you’ve got to watch the video to hear it.

This CNN interview is from almost 4 years ago, so it is not new by any means. But LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman is all in on her rape claims right now nonetheless. The only explanation I can figure is that Hoffman has severe Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), like so many other wealthy leftists.

Change my mind.