Good coverage of FascistBook's work in spreading propaganda.

And the source here is Townhall, which is mostly left of center.

There are hundreds of examples you can point to that show that “FaceBook” is more appropriately called ‘FascistBook’. This one is new though, and it contains multiple emails showing the coordination of the fear porn propaganda between FB and government bureaucrats.

Emails between federal agencies and Facebook employees from November 2020 obtained and released by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) show how the social media giant was guided in its messaging surrounding COVID-19, who it was told should be targeted, how users should be targeted, and what was being done to use social media to "drive uptake of vaccines."

In a chain of emails initially planning a meeting between Dr. Deborah Birx and Facebook's Vice President of Health, the CDC provided updates and suggestions for how Facebook could package government data to make it "resonate" with users more and to whom information needed to be directed.

This article doesn’t really cover the bogus “fact checking” and censorship aspects of the propaganda operation here in the U.S., but under my rules this sort of backdoor coordination of messaging would still be strictly prohibited under formal anti-propaganda rules.

The government has plenty of methods and forums to put forth their ideas and recommendations openly and upfront, and in any of those they should have to put their individual names on the content. Using the generic “CDC” would not cut it at all. The messaging would HAVE TO INCLUDE the names of the people who supported each message. And in any forum, any opposing voices should be free to contribute, and any claims of “misinformation” coming from the government would require substantial proof via due process beforehand where decisions would be made by impartial parties.

I digress a bit here, but in many if not most cases the ruling would be that the government has NOT proven the opposition to be spreading misinformation. If you think about the common practice of getting a 2nd or even 3rd opinion for any serious medical conditions and/or treatments, to my knowledge when differences of opinion arise, none of those opinions are determined to be “misinformation”.

If you haven’t realized yet that thousands of very experienced and very knowledgeable medical professional of all kinds worldwide have very different ideas on how Corona should have been and should be handled going forward, you need to fully grasp that ASAP. And most of those are people who have actually been treating Corona patients, as opposed to little Fascist Fauci who hasn’t treated anyone in decades.

At a minimum, you have multiple valid methods of treating people and sparing the maximum numbers of lives. At worst, you have a medical establishment in many Western countries that is beholden to big pharma and the kickbacks they are spreading around, while at the same time enjoying their newfound power courtesy of the scamdemic. When you are aware that there is still no formal treatment protocol once someone is sick, other than fighting to keep families and even doctors from using HCQ and/or Ivermectin and/or other drugs and supplements that studies have shown are somewhat effective to very effective, you know what the answer is.