An example of invalid data on an election server, and how data on the server can be changed easily
In case you missed it, and odds are good that you did miss it.
What do you think about 135,000 “test votes” left on an election server in NYC??? It happened last year in the NYC mayor’s race, and if not corrected the current mayor would have lost.
The full text of the NYC Board Of Elections statement is required:
Are you convinced?? Are you confident nothing like this happened in 2020 and was not corrected???? I’m sure as hell not.
There's confirmation here in this one statement of a few huge items that election fraud experts have been pointing out for months now:
1. Fake ballots can be on the machines to begin with. Which means fake ballots can be added to the machines at any point. (Yes "test ballots" are fake ballots. Any ballot which does not represent the single and only copy of one valid voter's choices is, by definition, a fake ballot. Since they are supposedly "test ballots" here I'm not calling them fraudulent ballots, but of course fake ballots can also be fraudulent ballots.)
2. The fake ballots can be deleted, which means any ballots can be deleted.
3. The entire final tally can be recalculated after deleting various ballots and perhaps adding in ballots that weren't present in the results before.
4. With no clear record kept of various voting database system actions (AKA a transaction log that cannot be altered or deleted), there is no way to know who did what or when they did it.
Change my mind.
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1410210966864809985?s=19